Continuous Improvement, Keyan Zandy, Lean Construction

Constructor: What Behavioral Science Can Teach Us About Why Projects Go Sideways

August 13, 2025

By Keyan Zandy

Lean construction teaches us to eliminate waste, create flow, and continuously improve. But some of the most persistent issues on projects don’t come from flawed schedules or poor coordination—they come from something more human: how we think.

The truth is, our brains are full of shortcuts. They’re built to help us survive, not necessarily to thrive in the fast-moving, high-stakes environment of a construction site. But if we understand the way these patterns show up in our work, we can lead better, plan better, and build smarter.

Here are four cognitive principles from behavioral science that regularly show up on our jobsites—and how Lean thinking helps us address them.

 

1. The Planning Fallacy 

We tend to underestimate how long tasks will take, even when we’ve done them before.

This shows up all the time in construction. Teams build schedules around ideal conditions—clean jobsite, full crew, no disruptions—but that’s rarely what happens in the field. We plan based on what we hope will happen instead of what usually does. I’ve seen this firsthand. On one healthcare renovation project, patient room drywall was scheduled based on standard install rates, but no one considered the tighter spacing and MEP congestion. The crews moved slower, and that delay had a ripple effect through all the downstream trades.

Lean helps by focusing on what’s reliable. The Last Planner® System encourages us to plan based on actual field conditions and track what gets done week to week. Instead of just aiming for productivity, we focus on making and keeping commitments.

2. Negativity Bias 

Our brains are wired to remember negative experiences more strongly than positive ones.

In construction, one bad experience can shape how a team or trade partner is viewed—even long after things have improved. Maybe a sub shows up late to one coordination meeting and suddenly they’re labeled unreliable, even if they’ve performed well otherwise. I remember working with a concrete contractor who was delayed on pour day because of a missed embed. We got the issue fixed quickly, but for the rest of the project, that team remained skeptical of every coordination detail. That one incident impacted everything that followed.

Lean encourages us to balance the conversation. Daily huddles help teams surface issues quickly, but they also give us a chance to recognize progress and reinforce what’s working. Trust is built in those small, consistent moments, not just in the big wins.

3. Decision Avoidance

When decisions involve risk or uncertainty, people tend to delay or defer. That hesitation can really cost us.

In construction, we’ve all seen how slow decisions can jam up the schedule. Delayed selections, unanswered RFIs, or design decisions that keep getting pushed can lead to a lot of wasted time and friction. On one job, we had to pivot on light fixtures due to long lead times. We proposed solid alternates, but the design team kept circling back, frustrated that what they initially designed would not meet the schedule. Weeks went by. The delay compressed the schedule and created avoidable conflict between trades.

Lean gives us tools to make timely, informed choices. Structured decision-making methods like Choosing by Advantages help clarify priorities. And more importantly, Lean encourages empowering those closest to the work, the people with the best perspective, to weigh in and move things forward.

4. Confirmation Bias

Once we form a belief, we tend to look for information that supports it and ignore what doesn’t.

This can be dangerous on a jobsite. If someone believes a team isn’t performing, they’ll likely notice every small mistake—and miss signs of improvement. Or a designer might be so confident in a detail that they overlook feedback from the field about how it really installs.

On one project, a PM assumed a drywall sub was always behind based on something they had “heard through the grapevine”. That belief colored how every issue was viewed, even when other trades were the root cause. The sub’s morale dropped, and collaboration suffered.

Lean encourages us to question assumptions. A3 problem-solving, root cause analysis, and even simply asking, “What’s really going on here?” help teams pause and look at facts instead of opinions. That kind of thinking leads to better outcomes—and better relationships.

 

Final Thoughts

Lean construction isn’t just about tools and workflows. It’s about people—and people bring all kinds of mental habits with them to the jobsite.

When we understand how those habits show up, we can lead with greater awareness, deeper empathy, and more clarity. These cognitive patterns are part of being human, but Lean gives us a framework to work through them, together.

Better thinking leads to better building.

This article was written for Constructor Magazine’s Sep/Oct 2025 issue; you can read it here:

https://constructornovdec2024.mydigitalpublication.com/publication/?i=851709&p=32&view=issueViewer